This is important for human reading and interpretation of pathway biology. Graphviz view provides better control of node and edge attributes, better view of pathway topology, better understanding of the pathway analysis statistics.
Currently only KEGG pathways are implemented. Hopefully, pathways from Reactome, NCI and other databases will be supported in the future. However, Pathview downloads individual pathway graphs and data files through html access, which is freely available for academic and non-commerical uses.
Pathview provides strong support for data integration. It works with: 1 essentially all types of biological data mappable to pathways, 2 over 10 types of gene or protein IDs, and 20 types of compound or metabolite IDs, 3 pathways for over species as well as KEGG orthology, 4 varoius data attributes and formats, i. Pathview is open source, fully automated and error-resistant.
Therefore, it seamlessly integrates with pathway or gene set analysis tools. In the vignette tutorial , we show an integrated analysis using pathview with anothr the Bioconductor gage package [Luo et al, ], available from the Bioconductor website. In this section, we present a few examples on visualizing and integrating user data onto pathways using pathview package.
We just show you the output graphs here, and details are described in the vignette. This gives you an brief idea on how pathview may fit in your research and data analysis.
Pathview's function is much more than shown here, and please check the Overview section and the vignette for details. Figure 1. Figure 2. Example Graphviz view on gene data hsa Cell cycle.
Figure 3. Example KEGG view with multiple matched samples new feature v1. Figure 4. Example Graphviz view with multiple unmatched samples new feature v1. If you are using the full assembly, this can be a good way to look at the coverage. This viewer highlights the arrows, rather than the boxed names of the enzymes in the pathway as previous versions did.
This is still useful, but if you want to do fancier things, you should continue below! The data you have from the results page will only be available for a couple of days. You will need to download the data I recommend the detailed data! There is an easy way to pull them back up in the future though — provided you have the downloaded file with the KO numbers:.
This command will create a list of transcripts and KO values with blank lines from transcripts that were not annotated removed. KEGG will then give you a similar listing to the one you had in your initial results file, with the pathways listed and the number of hits per pathway.
If you click a pathway, you can get: This gives you a colored box for each transcript found in your input set. You can change the color easily in photoshop, powerpoint, etc. One thing I like to do if I am using differential expression data is to make a figure that demonstrates both how much of the pathway was identified, as well as how many of those identified transcripts are differentially expressed. This allows clear visualization of what might be missing from the differential expression set.
Note that in this example terms in green are the subset from DE. This allows you to differentiate between transcripts that may have been missed in your assembly and those that you have evidence for not being differentially expressed! You can also do this whole analysis with KO values from the annotation table that comes from trinotate! To generate the file of KEGG terms, you can do the following:. You can also use Ghost Koala for microbiome and metagenomic data with this annotation system as well.
The Meren Lab has a great post about how to do this. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Skip to Content Skip to Sidebar. Step 3: Retrieve your results You will get an email telling you that your job is complete, with a link to the results.
The results page will look like this: There are a couple of things that you can dig into here. Step 6: Advanced Visualization One thing I like to do if I am using differential expression data is to make a figure that demonstrates both how much of the pathway was identified, as well as how many of those identified transcripts are differentially expressed.
0コメント