Will you please give some feedback? If one of these 4 methods works for you please accept my answer. Thanks, Chris Britt. If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.
Please note: Do not post advertisements, offensive material, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members.
All submitted content is subject to our Terms Of Use. General discussion. Share Flag. Hi, Sorry about the late reply, I've been on holiday.
I'm stumped Tuesday, November 2, PM. Mitchell 0. Any progress on this issue? I am seeing the same results with the registry entry set to 0 and netsh results show it as disabled but the PCI scan is showing it enabled. Any insight would be appreciated. Wednesday, March 23, PM.
I've seen weird stuff like that before. Thursday, March 24, AM. Any information anyone can give would be very helpful Thanks. Friday, April 8, AM. This answer does not seem adequate when several of us have the same issue and still have a flag reported by the PCI compliance scan. Someone suggested setting the parameters in the other control sets beyond current control set. No one has mentioned also setting the parameters for IPv6, does it matter?
I have added it to all these places and will let you know the result of my next scan. Friday, April 15, PM. Failed again Thursday, April 21, PM. I'm having this same issue. Any updates on this thread?
Friday, July 8, PM. We never succeeded with an automated PCI compliance scan even after making all the suggested changes by the vendor and Microsoft. We finally got resolution by contacting the vendor running the scan for us and making a manual exception to override the results and we passed.
So I can only suggest you do the same and hopefully your compliance vendor will give you approval. Could it be the scanner is getting the timestamp response from an intermediary device firewall, router, load balancer, etc..
Is this a security vulnerability that requires Microsoft to issue a new security update? No additional update is required. What causes this threat? What might an attacker use this function to do? An attacker who exploited this vulnerability could cause the affected system to reset TCP connections. Will this vulnerability be documented in the MS security bulletin? This vulnerability does not reproduce on systems that are fully updated. No additional security update is required.
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to update the previously released security bulletin. We continue to encourage customers follow our Protect Your PC guidance of enabling a firewall, getting software updates and installing ant-virus software. All Windows users should apply the latest Microsoft security updates to help make sure that their computers are as protected as possible.
If you are not sure whether your software is up to date, visit the Microsoft Update Web site , scan your computer for available updates, and install any high-priority updates that are offered to you. If you have Automatic Updates enabled, the updates are delivered to you when they are released, but you have to make sure you install them. For more information about this setting, visit the following Web site. The recommendation is to use the value of 0 to disable these options.
0コメント