Sincerely Gianluca Gottardi. Message 5 of 7. Hi Gianluca gianluca. John Holtz, P. Global Product Support Autodesk, Inc. If not provided already, be sure to indicate the version of Inventor Nastran you are using!
Message 6 of 7. Hi Mr. Holtz, yes I have an Algor version Message 7 of 7. Gottardi, Regrettably, we're unable to generate new licenses for this product. I am sorry, but I do not have any suggestions. Post Reply. Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.
Main Software Index. Algor 16 Where can it be installed? Within the website you wil find links to our lab assignment, solution, class website, email addresses, presentation, report and helpful links to get you started with Algor software. Algor software is an award wining Finite Element Analysis FEA software package for analyzing many different types of engineering problems. FEA is a method which breaks a part into "infinite" elements and estimates them individually for stress and heat analysis.
There was a small change that you had to make with in Inventor to work properly with previous versions of DesignSTAR, but the new update works with no problems. The small change was to change in Inventor the version of ACIS SAT file that it saved to version 6, so if you had made this change by going to their knowledge base, then you would have had no problem.
One point he made was about how it is much more difficult to apply boundary conditions in Algor as compared to DesignSTAR. The way he explained how you have to do it in Algor, it doesn't sound like it changed from when I used it many years ago.
He also mentioned that Algor's tech support is regional now, and that the person who supports your region has other responsibilties other than support so you don't always get the person on the phone right away. Also I thought that if you only have to rely on one person, maybe that person doesn't know how to do what is your bread-and-butter analysis.
I saw that DesignSpace and DesignStar, both were extremely friendly in applying boundary conditions. They say they have it now! Not sure! Also, they failed to mesh our part on a first go. We had to do lot of tweaking with Cosmos to make it finally work. DesignSpace on the other hand meshed the whole assembly with automatic contacts in less than 30 mins. That really was impressive for me. Cosmos requires "matching nodes" which inturn made the mesher fail.
This was profound in the modal analysis we ran. Also we were impressed to see that DesignSpace has an option of Fatigue module. We are not purchasing right now, but I do see fatigue as a problem for our products on a long run.
Would be nice to have that in the future. So, there were several things that we observed. There are not too many things that will justify us to buy Cosmos over designspace. A couple of thousand is not what we are concerned about. Its the overall feel of the product and I think DesignSpace really did that. I personally did not get a chance to play too much with Algor, so cant make similar comments about Algor and is still in the race as our other user used Algor in his previous life.
Waiting to hear your comments. After much discussions and ado I am glad to update you folks that we have indeed purchased Designspace and our experience so far is "excellent". Especially the local VARs are really helpful.
Tech support is really great. I sincerely appreciate all your help. Every CAE software in the market, I am sure has its own goods and bad. Thanks to one and all who replied to this post. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography SLA 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time.
Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now. This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. Close Box.
0コメント